Category Archives: Favourite Books

Blue Nights

Joan Didion’s Blue Nights starts off much like its precursor, The Year of Magical Thinking - with a death, this time of Didion’s only child, Quintana Roo. Two years after her husband, John Gregory Dunne, passed away of a heart attack, Didion again finds herself at a loss.

Unlike Magical Thinking, however, Blue Nights is a slim little memoir . And though it’s littered with memories of Quintana Roo, Nights seems to deal more with the idea of physical and cognitive frailty than grief. At 76, Didion admits that she’s losing her process; she worries about  her “new inability to summon the right word, the apt thought, the connection that enables the words to make sense, the rhythm, the music itself”.

Where Magical Thinking felt seamless, Nights creates a cohesive whole because its individual pieces don’t fit – in this dissonance, you’re acutely aware of the author’s dwindling abilities. It’s a heartbreaking reminder that even the brightest, sharpest creative minds fall prey to inevitability – though it’s clear Didion has years of fight left in her.

Almost more impressive than the book itself is the accompanying short film, created by Didion’s nephew Griffin Dunne. Two clips have been released so far, combining visual artistry with Didion’s lyrical narration to create a beautiful representation of the novel – as Dunne himself puts it “an audiobook for the eyes”.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Books Everyone Should Read, Favourite Authors, Favourite Books, Recent Reads

Ten Thousand Saints

If Eleanor Henderson’s Ten Thousand Saints is what a debut novel should look like, then I (and many other authors, aspiring and published alike) should just give up on the pipe dream now. No other book in recent memory has resounded with me for so long   – in fact, Saints raised the bar so high that I didn’t read anything else for a week after I’d turned the last page, because nothing I read next could compare.

Ten Thousand Saints is, at its heart, a story about two best friends named Teddy and Jude – one of whom has to grow up too fast, and the other of whom never gets the chance to. When Teddy dies of an accidental overdose, he leaves behind a world devastated by his absence – and a pregnant one-night stand, Jude’s fifteen-year-old stepsister, Eliza. The grieving characters form a makeshift family around this pregnancy, every member hoping to keep Teddy’s memory alive for just a little longer.

While Henderson’s Saints spans time and space, navigating deftly from 1987 through 2000, Vermont to New York City, it’s also a book of great cultural and historical awareness. Her characters are each intimately affected by the straight-edged music scene; one in particular feels the devastating power of the early AIDS epidemic. Sexuality, sexual orientation; drugs, alcohol and excess – while admittedly extreme, the novel’s underlying themes are all handled with great understanding.

And if, amidst the guitar riffs and drumbeats, the reader starts to feel a little overwhelmed by the noise, it’s at the precise instant when the characters, too, are reaching their breaking point.

Saints is meant to challenge. It strives to overwhelm.

And it does so remarkably well.

1 Comment

Filed under Books Everyone Should Read, Favourite Authors, Favourite Books, Recent Reads

The Night Circus

First of all, yet another apology (hopefully the last of its kind for awhile) for the prolonged lapse between posts. I promise, though, it’s not for lack of wonderful books – I’ve merely spent more time reading than writing.

…I also recently acquired a rather feisty little black lab puppy, if that makes things any more forgivable.

In my six-month absence, a few books have left an indelible impression on me – they are stories I carried with me for days, sometimes weeks, after I’d turned the last page. The most recent of these is Erin Morgenstern’s debut novel, The Night Circus.

At the centre of this novel is the aptly named Le Cirque de Rêves, a magical travelling circus that arrives unannounced in fields across the globe, opening its gates only between the hours of dusk and dawn. Unbeknownst to most, Le Cirque was created to serve as the duelling grounds for two young magicians, Celia and Marco, who are chosen as the latest competitors in a longstanding feud between Celia’s father, Prospero the Enchanter, and his rival, Mr A H. Of course, it’s in the field of battle that our young protagonists fall in love.

While seemingly reminiscent of the sweeping magical landscape we all know from Harry Potter, Morgenstern’s Circus is a far more lush reality. Her imagery is impeccable, and the story unfolds just slowly enough to drive this particular reader tantalizingly close to insanity. Its primary love story is one I can’t resist: ill-fated lovers struggling to rewrite the laws of the universe, because the world as they know it will not abide them.

Of course, the fact that I found great pleasure in Circus does not make it an easy, pleasurable read. The narrative weaves several stories together, in layers that skip back and forth through time. Even with a just few dozen pages to go, the story’s resolution eluded me – something that delighted as much as it frustrated me, but I know people who felt this pacing detracted from their enjoyment of the book. I also must admit that the narrative arc didn’t kindly deliver me at its conclusion, so much as unceremoniously dump me there.

At the very least, The Night Circus takes a touch more dedication and concentration than one would generally expect from its genre.

In the end, though, I feel Circus has lived up to its hype – the book itself is a work of  graphic art, and Morgenstern’s talent is clearly evident. It’s also a book that, despite the slightly misguided comparison, is well-suited for a post-Potter world.

1 Comment

Filed under Cover Art, Favourite Books, Favourites, Recent Reads

Everyone Loves You When You’re Dead

In his fascinating and informative book, the Game, Neil Strauss penetrated the secret society of pick-up artists to deliver a manual that was more than just the “Guide to Getting Laid” it is  often misinterpreted as. In Emergency, he taught us how to “be self-sufficient and survive without the system.”

The newest book from “the Mike Tyson of Interviewers”, Everyone Loves You When You’re Dead, can be summarized quite nicely by its tagline:

You can tell a lot about somebody in a minute. If you choose the right minute. Here are 228 of them.

In it, readers are invited to “join” Neil Strauss as he interviews some of the most iconic celebrities in the world: from intimate conversation with Britney Spears to shooting guns with Ludacris. He makes Lady Gaga cry and shops for Pampers with Snoop Dogg. Assembled from the original interview tapes and transcripts, the book is a collection of telling moments that would have never made it to print otherwise.  As he says in the book’s Preamble:

So to put this book together, I went back to my original recordings, notes, and transcripts, and selected the best moments from the three-thousand-something articles I’ve written over the years. But instead of looking for the pieces that broke news or sold the most magazines, or received the best feedback, I searched for the truth or essence behind each person, story or experience. Often it came from something I’d previously ignored: an uncomfortable silence, a small misunderstanding, or a scattered thought that had been compressed into a sound bite. Other times it came from something more dramatic, like an emotional confession, a run-in with the police, or a drug-induced psychosis.

Funny enough, the book tells almost as much about its author as its subjects: Strauss is a typically intimate writer, and this book shows that his interview style is no different – it seems, at least, that the people he’s interviewing get a little something of Strauss himself in return for baring their own souls to the world.

The pop-culture junkie in me loves this book; the word-nerd might be a little in love with Strauss himself.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Books Everyone Should Read, Cover Art, Currently Reading, Favourite Authors, Favourite Books, Recent Reads

Galatea 2.2

Published in 1995, Richard Power’s Galatea 2.2 isn’t exactly a recent read of mine. It is, however, the only book I reread as often as Lolita (which is to say, it’s one of only two books I read so often that the pages are permanently bowed – every other book I own is in nearly pristine condition).

Coincidentally, Powers was also introduced to me by the same professor who put Lolita on my first year Lit. syllabus and pretty much changed my life forever. Not to be dramatic or anything.

Galatea 2.2 is the pseudo-autobiographical story of Richard Powers himself; it’s uncertain which specific events of the novel are based in reality and which are altered to further plot, but it’s clearly a story meant to write away some of Powers’ personal demons. In the novel, Powers returns to his alma mater – simply known as “U” – after ending a beautiful but volatile, doomed relationship with a women referred to as “C”.  While spending the year as an in-house author at U, Powers meets a cognitive neurologist named Philip Lentz, who convinces him to participate in an experiment involving artificial intelligence. Lentz bets his fellow scientists that he can build a computer that can produce an analysis of a literary text that is indistinguishable from one produced by a human – thus proving that the human brain can be mapped by means of computer-based neural networks. It falls to Powers to “teach” this machine.

What follows is equal parts computer theory, cognitive science and soaring, heartbreaking prose. Powers manages to make every incarnation of “Imp[lementation] A”  (of which there are eight, from A to H) feel less about the technology and more about biology – each attempt to create a machine that thinks for itself is viewed as a birth. Every time the system stops or stalls, it’s like watching a toddler learn to walk.

Imp H, on the other hand, could link any set of things into a vast, standing constellation. But it had no nose, mouth, fingers, and only the most rudimentary eyes and ears. It was like some caterpillar trapped by sadistic children in a coffee can, a token breathing hole punched in its prison lid. What monstrous intelligence would fly off from such a creature’s chrysalis?

Powers’ greatest skill is his ability to perfectly balance intellectually engaging facts with emotionally wrenching story-telling; every scientific statement is well-researched and accompanied by a mini-tutorial, yet so prosaically written that you rarely notice the science. If textbooks were this beautifully written, I’d have been a neurologist instead of a starving artist.

Woven throughout the scientific story arc is the fictional Powers’ own love story, told to the final incarnation of the machine, Imp H. Doomed almost from the start, the romance spans years and continents before ultimately burning out, as most supernovas do. In its ashes, Powers is left isolated and struggling with a profound case of writer’s block:

The moment the manuscript left my hands, I went slack… instead of catharsis, I felt nothing. Anaesthesia.

What was I supposed to do for the rest of my life? The rest of the afternoon alone seemed unfillable. I went shopping. As always, retail left me with an ice-cream headache.

I figured I might write again, at least one, if the thing could start with that magic first line. But the train – that train I asked the reader to picture – was hung at departure.

Galatea 2.2 is a novel whose themes clash and clatter; philosophy wars with technology, science with the sheer power of emotion and human connection. And in the end, there’s so much carnage on either side, nobody knows who wins.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Books Everyone Should Read, Favourite Authors, Favourite Books

Unbearable Lightness

Celebrity memoirs. A dubious genre of literature if ever there was one. Case in point, the cover of Tori Spelling’s  Uncharted TerriTORI declares her a “#1 New York Times Bestselling Author”, while failing to mention just how many of its readers cared more for juicy celebrity gossip than quality of writing. With that in mind, I was a bit hesitant to drop the $29.99 for Portia De Rossi’s Unbearable Lightness, despite the number of positive reviews I’d come across.

A couple of things pleasantly surprised me about the book, however.

First, De Rossi (now Degeneres) is quite a formidable author. With no ghost writer credited anywhere that I could see, I have to assume that the novel was written in her own words. If this is true, De Rossi is a bright, well-spoken, articulate woman. More importantly, she’s a woman whose carefully chosen words perfectly capture the complexities of her eating disorder – the tense relationship with food, the unwillingness to believe that weighing 82lbs could ever be a problem, the uphill battle of recovery. If nothing else, De Rossi strips anorexia of its glamour; she shows her struggle as calculating, obsessive and consuming without pandering for pity.

I didn’t decide to become anorexic. It snuck up on me disguised as a healthy diet, a professional attitude. Being as thin as possible was a way to make the job of being an actress easier . . .

It’s a matter-of-fact portrayal of her fifteen-year descent into eating disorder, complete with the crazed rationality of brushing her teeth without toothpaste to do away with the  “incidental calories” that can make or break a diet. It’s also the heartbreaking struggle of a woman not quite able to face her own sexuality – one secret fuels the other; anorexia serves as the control De Rossi manages to exert over a world she isn’t convinced is ready to accept her as a homosexual woman.

As I slip out of bed and do deep lunges across the floor to the bathroom, I promise myself to cut my calorie intake in half to 150 for the day and to take twenty laxatives. That should do something to help. But it’s not the weight gain from the six ounces of yogurt that worries me. It’s the loss of self-control. It’s the fear that maybe I’ve lost it for good. I start sobbing now as I lunge my way across the floor and I wonder how many calories I’m burning by sobbing. Sobbing and lunging—it’s got to be at least 30 calories. It crosses my mind to vocalize my thoughts of self-loathing, because speaking the thoughts that fuel the sobs would have to burn more calories than just thinking the thoughts and so I say, “You’re nothing. You’re average. You’re an ordinary, average, fat piece of shit. You have no self-control. You’re a stupid, fat, disgusting dyke. You ugly, stupid, bitch!” As I reach the bathroom and wipe away the last of my tears, I’m alarmed by the silence; the voice has stopped.

The other surprise is how seldom she mentions wife Ellen Degenerous. It’s clear in the epilogue that she considers Ellen her saving grace; there’s even a charming little scene in which Ellen, after reading Unbearable Lightness,  tells Portia to make sure the world knows she isn’t “crazy” anymore. But there are no sordid details, no tawdry secret hookups that flower into the most publicized gay marriage ever.  Her marriage remains sacred; their relationship is theirs. Whatever petty gossip the public is looking for, De Rossi refuses to even go there. The focus remains on disease and recovery, she skips right over the tabloid fodder.

Admittedly, Unbearable Lightness is a hard book to read; it’s awful to imagine someone carefully calculating 300 calories worth of food for a day. It’s equally awful to realize how terrified De Rossi was of being gay, yet alone of people finding out. But it’s a book that’s worth reading, even for us elitists who assume celebrity memoirs can’t possibly have any literary merit.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Currently Reading, Favourite Books, Recent Reads

Combat Camera

A.J. Somerset’s Combat Camera (Biblioasis) was yet another of my more serendipitous finds: I just saw it at the bookstore out of the corner of my eye a few days ago, and picked it up on a whim. Apparently, I’m far more a sucker for hot pink than I really ought to admit in public.

Anyway, one glance at the write-up on the back cover and I was sold.

Somerset’s debut novel is the story of Lucas Zane, a brilliant photographer unravelled by years of covering the most brutal wars of the late twentieth century. Drunk, burned out and without an ounce of ambition left, he finds himself in Toronto, where he pays rent by taking photographs for a pornographer named Richard Barker.

On set he meets Melissa, a pretty young stripper as much in need of a father figure as Zane is in need of inspiration.

And then things get complicated.

As a former soldier, photographer and journalist, Somerset knows his subject matter. From meticulous detail to sweeping landscapes, the novel’s atmosphere is consistently lush and three-dimensional. Photographic tableaus blend seamlessly with snappy dialogue; it’s very much like reading a movie. Not a screenplay or a script, but an actual narrative visualization.

While occasionally dense with technical details, Zane (and Somerset’s) preoccupation with lenses and lighting is often a source of well-placed levity. For example:

I tried to photograph it all, but I couldn’t keep steady and couldn’t get a  clear shot. I was reduced to make the Hail Mary shot, where you put on a wide-angle lens and hold the camera up in the air and just keep shooting in the vague and desperate hope of getting something publishable. At some point, someone began to spray champagne, which ruined my thirty-five to seventy zoom. There was champagne all over the glass and it was hell to clean it. Eventually, I just wrote that one off.

Other times, it serves as a haunting vehicle for vivid war-time flashbacks, the likes of which plague Zane throughout the book. The juxtaposition of tragedy and art (or the art in tragedy) is by no means a new concept, but rarely is it handled with such skill.

While the ending wasn’t necessarily predictable, it was inevitable, which is the one minor complaint I have. Otherwise I found Combat Camera to be engaging, vivid and heartbreaking. I believed Zane, more than any other character I’ve read in the recent past. His fumbling tragedy never took a misstep, and I appreciate that a great deal.

1 Comment

Filed under Favourite Books, Recent Reads

The Gun Seller

Published in 1996, Hugh Laurie’s The Gun Seller was another one of those serendipitous finds – a characteristically obsessive Google search revealed that the star of House (and Jeeves and Wooster, Black Adder and A Bit of Frye and Laurie) had penned a novel.

Obviously, I had to read it.

The Gun Seller tells the story of Thomas Lang, a former Scots Guards Captain who finds himself facing off with “rogue CIA agents, wannabe terrorists, and an arms dealer looking to make a high-tech killing”.

The fun part of The Gun Seller is its characteristically British humour – sarcastic, wry and witty. Laurie’s particular talents involve some ingenious wordplay, including literary and cinematic references, very literal interpretations of cliches and perfectly chosen little nicknames. Thomas Lang resonates with that Hugh Laurie sense of humour; it’s a part I’d love to see him play, were a screenplay ever to be written.

To call it a typical spy novel would do the novel a disservice – in fact, I’m struggling to find a genre it fits perfectly into. Vanity Fair calls it a spoof, but that’s not really it either. The Gun Seller mocks the traditional trappings of a spy novel, sure, but it’s not a continuous parody from start to finish – through all its mocking, there’s a harrowing, emotionally charged story.

The plot speeds along, despite its many surprising detours. Lang isn’t a smooth 007 spy-type; he’s making it up as he goes along. Half the time you can’t even tell whose side he’s on – and you’re not sure he knows either. It’s like Bertie Wooster playing at James Bond.

Enemies turn out to be friends; trusted allies are revealed as enemies. And you laugh the entire way through.

It also turns out that Laurie originally submitted the novel under a pseudonym, not wanting to be another one of those “celebrity authors” we all turn our noses up at. He only revealed his identity after it had been accepted, and even then only because his publicist encouraged him to.

And here’s a little treat for those of us who are completely and hopelessly in lust with Hugh Laurie.

Band From TV‘s cover of the Stones’ You Can’t Always Get What You Want, which pretty predominantly features Hugh Laurie’s vocal and keyboard talents.

You’re welcome.

1 Comment

Filed under Favourite Authors, Favourite Books

Play It As It Lays

“What makes Iago evil? Some people ask. I never ask.”

As with most of my favourite books, Play It As It Lays found it way onto my bookshelf through a series of random and seemingly fated coincidences. I’ve a tendency to periodically Google my favourite authors (Coupland, Danielewski, Bret Easton Ellis, etc.), and one day happened upon this little gem on the Chapters/Indigo website. Yup, that’s right; a list of Douglas Coupland’s Top Ten Reads.

Needless to say, I immediately ran out to get a copy of the very first book on that list: Play It As It Lays.

From first sentence to last, I fell in love with Didion’s writing style. It’s the sort of bare, minimalistic fiction that means every sentence, every word is meticulously chosen: there’s little to Play It As It Lays that is extraneous or unessential. It seems nothing ever happens, nobody really cares. Conversations consist of quips and disinterested half-sentences. And yet, the novel’s protagonist, Maria  (pronounced Mar-eye-uh), navigates through the most devastating of life’s moments:  her marriage is doomed, toxic; her career at a standstill. She has an abortion, holds the hand of a close friend as he commits suicide.

The novel is narrated predominately by Maria herself, who begins (and ends) her story from a mental institution. Broken up by the occasional forty-word chapter, italicized bits of fractured prose and spliced paragraphs, it’s a hopeless story fed by cocaine and Seconal. Relentlessly lonely, distanced. Even as her marriage crumbles, Maria cannot manage to connect:
Carter pulled her to her feet and kissed her.  She stood without moving and after awhile he let his arms drop.
“What’s the matter now,” he said.
“Nothing.”
“It’s all gone with you,” he said. “It used to be there but it’s gone.”
“Listen,” she said as if by rote. “I love you.”

Admittedly, it’s a very cold story. For pages upon pages, you’re convinced Maria suffers some sort of factory defect – she just doesn’t have the emotional capacity of a normal person. It’s a stunning, deeply unsettling portrayal of modernity and the entertainment industry. And it’s completely brilliant.

Which is probably why it, like Lolita, was named one of TIME’s 100 Best English-Language Novels.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Books Everyone Should Read, Favourite Authors, Favourite Books

Five Movie Adaptations That Didn’t Suck

As I’ve mentioned before, I’m not usually a big fan of movies- unlike books, which I’ll devour then reread until the binding gives away, movies rarely make any sort of indelible impression on me. As such, I’m twice as critical of movie adaptations of books I’ve loved; here’s a list of a few movies that I think did their literary counterparts justice.

1. American Psycho

Based on the novel by Bret Easton Ellis, the 2000 movie adaptation starred America’s favourite anger management poster-boy, Christian Bale.

2. Bright Lights, Big City

Very much so a movie of the late ’80s, featuring the incredibly adorable Michael J. Fox. Not the truest translation to film I’ve ever seen, but still a satisfying watch.

3. Thank You For Smoking

Aaron Eckhart captures the spirit of Nick Naylor – and Katie Holmes plays a slightly trampy, incredibly manipulative young reporter. It’s almost funnier than the book, if only because some of the humour translates better to film.

4. Lolita

Either version, really, each for their own reasons. Kubrick or Lyne; both have merits that make them worth watching. And let’s not forget, Lolita easily tops my list of favourite books, so the fact that I love the movie adaptations says a lot.

5. Where the Wild Things Are

Dave Eggers co-wrote the screenplay, Spike Jonze directed. It’s a twisted little flick, and a lot less kid-friendly than you’d think, but it was perfect for what it was meant to be.

And, as an added bonus:

Not a movie adaptation, no, but Coupland co-created and wrote most of the episode’s for CBC’s jPod television series. Admittedly, it was cancelled after the first season, but still worth every hour I spent watching all thirteen episodes back-to-back-to-back.

1 Comment

Filed under Favourite Books, Favourites, Not Books